Stop trying

October 2018

If there’s one thing that obsesses self-improvement junkies, it’s actually sticking with their regimens. Life hacks abound: Tell your friends about your plan so you’ll be embarrassed if you fail! Make sure you keep an unbroken streak! Charge yourself money if you don’t stick to it! Donate the money to your least favorite charity!1 Forget donations, how about electric shocks?

The escalating absurdity should tell you that this problem is unsolved. But in my opinion, that’s because everyone tries to do it wrong. Personally, I’ve found my productivity habits to be extremely long-lived when I make sure they’re literally zero maintenance. That is, when it’s habit time, it requires more willpower to break the habit than to keep going.

The delta between literally-zero-maintenance and not zero is staggeringly large, basically because nobody reliably has willpower.2 Sometimes you’ll need to execute your habit when you’re sleep-deprived, or in the middle of a really good book, or your significant other just broke up with you, or for whatever reason you just can’t be bothered to try. The only thing that can save your habit here, is if the habit is what happens when you can’t be bothered.

Zero maintenance is hard to achieve, but awesome when it works. For instance:

Each of these systems has lasted 2+ years, because at the moment of execution they require zero action from me to sustain—the default is for me to keep having the habit.

If you can’t achieve literal zero maintenance, it still makes a big difference if the maintenance effort can be batched to high-energy periods. For instance, my wake-up habit required me to prepare my coffee machine the day before, but I could do it any time that day. So instead of needing to have enough willpower when I was waking up, I just needed to have enough willpower at some point in the last 24 hours. If that had been too hard, I could have used a capsule machine and disposable cups, and batched the willpower even more, to just ordering new cups periodically.

Thanks to Alexey Guzey for the email prompting this and Eve Bigaj for reading a draft.


  1. Stickk played up the “anti-charity” angle at the beginning but seems to have dropped it on their current website; instead they default to a bunch of generic uncontroversial ones. (Plus the highly controversial2 Charity Navigator.) 

  2. Citation needed. 

  3. Eve tells me she doesn’t consider our bedtime consistent, and also that the pestering is gentle. 

Enjoyed this post? Get notified of new ones via email or RSS. Or comment:

Public (as ) submit ⤇